Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

USF requirement: As soon as the substantial majority of the course work is completed, the student must pass a written qualifying examination covering the subject matter in the major and related fields. This examination may be supplemented by an oral examination. Students must be enrolled for a minimum of two (2) hours of graduate credit in their discipline at the time they take the qualifying examination. If the exam is taken between semesters, students must be enrolled for a minimum of two (2) hours of graduate credit in the semester before or following the exam.

Within the College of Public Health, each department has a specific format for the comprehensive qualifying exam. It is the student’s responsibility to discuss with his/her doctoral committee the style and format required within the student’s department. The commonly used formats include, but are not limited to: a) Concept Paper and Written Take-Home Format, b) Written Take-Home Open Book Format, and c) Written In-College Closed Book Format. A department may also require an oral examination component. 

Regardless of the format used, once the qualifying examination is complete, the Doctoral Committee members are given at least two weeks to review the examination. Within three weeks of exam completion, the student will receive written feedback from the Doctoral Committee Chair, denoting strengths and weaknesses of the exam, and providing an evaluative assessment for each question.

2014-2016 Catalogs

When all required coursework is satisfactorily completed (including tools of research and prerequisites)
Expand
titleDescription of the DrPH Qualifying Exam
PhD Qualifying Examination

As soon as the substantial majority of the course work is completed, the student must pass a written comprehensive qualifying examination covering the subject matter in the major and related fields. Exam questions will be generated by the DrPH Admissions and Advisory Committee. The exam will be administered and evaluated by the student’s DrPH Dissertation Committee. Results of the written exam will be communicated in writing to the student within 15 working days of the examination. If all or part of the exam is failed, the student will have one more opportunity to retake the exam. After successful completion of the qualifying exam and appropriate paperwork is submitted to and approved by the Office of Graduate Studies, the student is admitted to candidacy and may register for dissertation hours in the semester following Office of Graduate Studies approval. 

2017 Catalog

When the majority of the student's coursework is satisfactorily completed, the student must pass a qualifying examination. The student is required to submit a written Doctoral Project Plan describing the proposed doctoral project, followed by an oral examination that relates the content, approach, and deliverables of the project to the DrPH curriculum domains in the student's concentration. The examination will be administered and evaluated by the student’s doctoral project committee. The student must enroll in at least two credits in the semester the exam is completed.

Please note that a DrPH student should not submit the "Admission to Candidacy" form to USF–it is not required in the 2017 program. Once the qualifying exam is approved, the student must submit the DrPH Qualifying Exam Completion Form to the College (see process below).

Expand
titleContent, Process, and Evaluation of Exam

DrPH Qualifying Exam Application

In order to take the qualifying exam, you must first complete the DrPH Qualifying Exam Completion Form to ensure that you are eligible to move forward

DrPH Qual Exam Completion Form

When the majority of the student’s coursework is satisfactorily completed, the student must pass a qualifying examination. The student is required to submit a written Doctoral Project Plan describing the proposed doctoral project, followed by an oral examination that relates the content, approach, and deliverables of the project to the DrPH curriculum domains in the student’s concentration. The examination will be administered and evaluated by the student’s doctoral project committee. The student must enroll in at least two credits in the semester the exam is completed. In order to qualify for submission of this form, the student must meet the following requirements:

  • Attainment of an overall and degree program Grade Point Average (GPA) of 3.00 at USF at the time of the exam.
  • All “I” and “M” grades, including “IF” and “MF”, must be cleared.
  • Registration in a minimum of two credits in the semester the form is submitted.
  • The field-based doctoral project should be designed to influence programs, policies, or systems addressing public health practice. The doctoral project must include a minimum of three high-quality, evidence-based deliverables, with at least one written product. The doctoral project must also demonstrate synthesis of competencies across all of the DrPH curriculum domains in the student's concentration, as follows:
    • Advanced Practice Leadership in Public Health:
      • Community Engagement
      • Leadership and Management
      • Communication and Education
      • Evidence-Informed Public Health
  • The student should begin working with their Major Professor early in the program to develop ideas for their doctoral project.  The student should then work with the Major Professor and other committee members as needed on completing the Doctoral Project Plan prior to submission for evaluation.
  • The Rubric for the written Doctoral Project Plan can be found here.
  • Once approved by the Major Professor, the student will notify the committee members of intention to be examined on the Doctoral Project Plan, and will schedule the oral examination with the committee members at a mutually agreeable time. The oral examination can take place via electronic means of communication if the student is unable to be physically present at the Tampa campus. The student must submit the final draft of the written Doctoral Project Plan to the committee members a minimum of two weeks prior to the scheduled oral examination.

Format of Qualifying Exam Presentation

  • The Chair of the Doctoral Committee introduces the student.
    • Oral presentation of the proposed Doctoral Project by student not to exceed 35 minutes.
    • First round of questions by committee members.
    • Second round of questions by committee members.
    • Final round of questions by committee if desired.

    Following the qualifying exam, the committee members convene to make final determination of the appropriateness of the doctoral project being proposed and to deliberate recommendations for changes.  The rubric for the oral exam can be found here.

    When the student passes the Qualifying Exam the committee may still require modifications to the Doctoral Project Plan at a later date. The committee must approve changes to the Doctoral Project if they are initiated by the student.

  • The oral examination will consist of questions and clarification on the content, approach, and deliverables of the proposal, as well as questions on how the proposal demonstrates synthesis of competencies across the domains in the student's concentration. Typical questions for the concentration in Advanced Practice Leadership in Public Health could include:
    • How does the proposed project engage the community? Explain how your content, approach, and deliverables are grounded in your knowledge of community engagement.
    • How does the proposed project develop the leadership skills or management goals of yourself or others connected to your project? Explain how your content, approach, and deliverables are grounded in your knowledge of the development of leadership skills, and how organizations and systems are managed.
    • How does the proposed project provide for the communication and education needed for transforming public health practice? Explain how your content, approach, and deliverables are grounded in your knowledge of communication and education in public health practice.
    • How are the approach, procedures, and deliverables of your project evidence-based? Explain how your content, approach, and deliverables are grounded in research evidence and methodology, and/or in evidence-based program or policy evaluation or program delivery methods.
  • The committee members will verify satisfactory completion of the qualifying examination by providing their signature on the DrPH Qualifying Exam Completion Form, within one week of completion of the qualifying examination. The signed form must be submitted to Academic and Student Affairs at cophdoctoral@health.usf.edu. The student must also upload the signed form to their students document folder in Box: https://usfhealth.account.box.com/login.
  • If the student's research involves human subjects, the student is responsible for applying for review by the appropriate IRB review board before proceeding with the proposed work.
  • Prior to approval of the doctoral project, the committee will agree on the final deliverables of the project.

    This examination may be supplemented by an oral examination. Students must be enrolled for a minimum of two (2) hours of graduate credit in their discipline at the time they take the qualifying examination. If the exam is taken between semesters, students must be enrolled for a minimum of two (2) hours of graduate credit in the semester before or following the exam.

    Expand
    titleAdmission to Candidacy

    In order to be admitted to doctoral candidacy, students must meet the following requirements at USF:

    • admission to a doctoral program
    • appointment of a Doctoral Committee,
    • attainment of an overall and degree program Grade Point Average (GPA) of 3.00 at USF at the time of candidacy. (All “I” and “M” grades, including “IF” and “MF”, must be cleared before candidacy may be finalized.)
    • successful completion of a qualifying examination
    • certification by the Doctoral Committee that the above qualifications have been successfully completed.

    The Admission to Candidacy form should be submitted for approval during the semester that the qualifying exams were completed, but no later than the semester following the successful completion of the exam. The form will be approved by the Dean of the College and forwarded to the Dean of the Office of Graduate Studies for final approval. Doctoral Candidacy is effective as of the day that the Office of Graduate Studies approves of the request and changes the student's status to 6C. For procedures and processing deadlines refer to the Office of Graduate Studies website at www.grad.usf.edu.

    Once candidacy status is approved, students with approved candidacy are eligible to enroll in dissertation hours (7980) in the semester that immediately follows the last business day of the approval window. For example, students approved during the Fall approval window may enroll in the Spring. Students approved during the Spring approval window may enroll in the summer and students approved during the Summer approval window may enroll in the Fall. Students may NOT enroll in dissertation hours prior to being admitted to doctoral candidacy.

    Each degree program has a required number of dissertation hours for completion of the degree. Departments may, with College approval, apply Directed Research hours toward the total number of dissertation hours required. Directed Research hours shall not exceed 50% of the dissertation hour requirement. No directed research hours will be converted to dissertation hours (i.e. a directed research course dropped and a dissertation course added) prior to or during the approval window. For more information refer to Enrollment Requirements in the Academic Policies section.

    Expand
    titlePhD Dissertation

    Dissertation requirements are for the academic degrees of PhD, DrPH and EdD The Dissertation must conform to the guidelines of the University. Refer to the Thesis and Dissertation Guidelines, available on the web at http://www.grad.usf.edu/thesis.php for information about requirements, procedures, and deadlines.

    Format
    Consult the ETD FAQ on Formatting (http://www.grad.usf.edu/ETD-FAQ.php)

    Directed Research
    Directed Research hours taken with the (Co) Major Professor(s) prior to approval to doctoral candidacy by the Office of Graduate Studies may satisfy up to 50% of the dissertation hour requirement, with program approval.

    Manuscript Processing Fee
    USF Regulation USF4-0107, http://regulationspolicies.usf.edu/regulations/pdfs/regulation-usf4.0107.pdf. Students participating in the dissertation process are required to pay a processing fee. More information is available on the website at http://www.grad.usf.edu/thesis.php.

    Doctoral Dissertation Defense
    Upon acceptance into candidacy, the doctoral student forms a dissertation committee that is approved by the college. The candidate, major professor and the committee members should meet regularly (at least once per term) to review the candidate’s progress. Minutes of committee meetings including date, who was in attendance, and action items are maintained by the candidate. 

    When the candidate, major professor and committee members agree that it is time to schedule the final defense of the dissertation, the candidate distributes the final dissertation draft at least 4 weeks before the final defense date. This time period allows the committee to thoroughly review the document and the student to make changes before the final defense. The final defense date must be at least one week prior to the final submission deadline to the Office of Graduate Studies.

    After the Doctoral Dissertation Committee has determined that the final draft of the dissertation is suitable for presentation; the Committee will request the scheduling and announcement of the Dissertation Defense (also called Final Oral Examination or Oral Defense.) Check with the College and Program for college and program specific procedures for this process. A copy of the announcement should be sent to the Office of Graduate Studies, preferably two weeks in advance of the defense date. The announcement must also be posted in a public forum for a minimum of twenty-four hours to comply with statute requirements for a public meeting. The student and the Major Professor (or, if Co-Major Professors, at least one) must be physically present at the defense. The student must successfully defend the dissertation to be able to proceed and complete the final submission process.

    Expand
    titleDissertation Defense Chair

    The Doctoral Dissertation Defense (Final Oral Examination) shall be presided by

    • An external committee member from outside the Department, School, or equivalent, hosting the doctoral program, but may be within the academic discipline.

    OR

    • A non-committee member (a.k.a. Outside Chair), (Refer to the individual Program's Degree Requirements in the Graduate Catalog for information).  If the Chair is from another institution, this individual must be approved for Affiliate Graduate Faculty status.

    The Doctoral Dissertation Defense Chair’s role includes overseeing the proceedings as well as serving as the student’s advocate, by ensuring fairness of the process.  Faculty holding joint, courtesy, or adjunct appointments in the degree-granting academic unit (i.e. Department or equivalent) cannot serve as the Defense Chair.   

    Expand
    titleProcedures for Conducting the Doctoral Dissertation Defense
    1. The Doctoral Dissertation defense (final oral examination) should be conducted within a timeline to allow for the student to make any necessary corrections following the defense and still meet the final copy deadline for turning in the Dissertation to the Office of Graduate Studies.The presentation should be considered an important function in the Department and all graduate students and faculty be encouraged to attend.
    2. The presentation and defense are open to the public and as such, must meet the requirements of the Sunshine Laws for the State of Florida. The Doctoral Dissertation Committee deliberation is not public.
    3. The room selected for the examination should have adequate seating with an alternate room selected in case of problems.
    4. It is required that all members of the Doctoral Dissertation Committee be present for the examination unless an absence is approved prior to the defense taking place by the Office of Graduate Studies Dean. In the event that a member cannot attend in person, participation is permissible via speakerphone or video conference. A minimum of three members, including the Major Professor is required to proceed with the defense. If a non-committee member chairs the Defense, this individual does not count as one of the three required members in attendance.  If an unforeseeable situation arises that would prevent compliance with this requirement, the Major Professor or Doctoral Dissertation Defense Chair should contact the Office of Graduate Studies for guidance and approval to proceed with the Defense. 
    5. The length of the examination period will generally not exceed three hours. Throughout this time the Doctoral Dissertation Defense Chair is to be in charge of all proceedings and, ideally, is expected to play a balancing role between advocacy and contention.
    6. The Outside Chair, at any time during the course of the examination, may request all visitors to leave.
    7. Presentation
      • The Outside Chair should open the proceedings by introducing the candidate and the Dissertation Committee.
      • The examination should begin with a presentation by the candidate designed to summarize the dissertation.
    8. Questions
      Following the presentation the Defense may be moved to a different setting for the main examination.  The College determines the order of the proceedings described below:
      • The Examination will consist of questions about the research by the Doctoral Dissertation Defense Chair and the Doctoral Dissertation Committee
      • It is suggested that questioning should be limited to about 15 minutes for each Doctoral Dissertation Committee member with subsequent rounds of questioning as necessary.
      • Questions from the faculty-at-large and/or the public may be allowed following the presentation.  It is suggested that questioning from the general audience be limited up to 5 minutes per person.
    9. Deliberations and Voting
      Following the completion of these proceedings, the Doctoral Dissertation Defense Chair
      • will ask all visitors and the candidate to leave and will reconvene the Doctoral Dissertation Committee only.
      • will preside over the deliberations and voting of the Committee (Note: if a non-committee member (Outside chair) is used he/she will not participate in the voting)
      • is responsible for tallying the votes and informing the candidate of the final decision.  The voting is to be limited to "pass" and "fail" votes. The vote of the Doctoral Dissertation Committee must be unanimous.  If unanimous agreement cannot be reached, the Doctoral Dissertation Defense Chair notifies the Department Chair (or appropriate equivalent) who will endeavor to resolve the dispute in an expedient fashion.
      • records the vote on the Successful Defense Form and conveys the decision of the Doctoral Dissertation Committee (Successful Defense Form) to the Department/College Graduate Office to be kept in the student's file

    Dissertation Final Submission Guidelines
    Information on requirements for submission of the finished and approved manuscript copies is available online at the Thesis and Dissertation website http://www.grad.usf.edu/thesis.php. Students who fail to submit the final copy of a dissertation by the posted submission deadline will not be considered for graduation. The student may be considered for graduation in the following semester and must therefore apply for the degree (graduation) by the posted deadline, enroll in a minimum of two (2) dissertation hours for that subsequent semester, and meet the submission requirements as posted on the Thesis/Dissertation website. Only after the Office of Graduate Studies has approved the manuscript can the student be certified for the degree.

    Mandatory Electronic Submission
    Students are required to submit the dissertation in an electronic format (ETD). Requirements and procedures are available at the Office of Graduate Studies website http://www.grad.usf.edu/thesis.php

    Submission for Official Publication and Archiving
    All dissertations will be submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies designated system for official publication and archiving.

    Changes after Publication
    Once a dissertation is approved and accepted by the Office of Graduate Studies for publication, it cannot be changed.

    Release of Dissertation Publications
    The University recognizes the benefits from collaboration with sponsors on research projects but also recognizes the possibility of conflicts of interest in the disclosure of the results of the collaborations. While the sponsor's economic interests in the restriction of disclosure should be considered, the University has a primary mission to extend knowledge and disseminate it to the public and the broader academic community. The University's “Statement of Policy Regarding Inventions and Works” acknowledges the possible need for delays in publication of sponsored research to protect the sponsor's interests, but it provides no definite guidelines for the restrictions of publication beyond the statement: “Disclosure delays mutually acceptable to the Inventor, the Vice President for Research, and the sponsor, if any, are authorized in order to allow patent applications to be filled prior to publication, thereby preserving patent rights...”1

    To protect the University's primary goal from undue compromise, the University has adopted the following guidelines:

    1. The recommendations of sponsors, regarding publication of research results should be considered advisory rather than mandatory.
    2. In support of academic discourse and the mission to promote and share academic works, Dissertations will be released for worldwide access once submitted to and approved by the USF Office of Graduate Studies. In the event that a patent or copyright application provides reason to delay the release of the Dissertation, a petition to request a one year delay may be submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies for consideration. Such requests must be received by the format check of the dissertation.
    3. Students should not be delayed in the final defense of their dissertations by agreements involving publication delays.

    Duty to Disclose New Inventions and Works
    USF 0-300 http://regulationspolicies.usf.edu/policies-and-procedures/pdfs/policy-0-300.pdf and USF 12.003 http://regulationspolicies.usf.edu/regulations/pdfs/regulation-usf12.003.pdf For information about the requirements of this policy contact the Division of Patents and Licensing at (813) 974-0994.

    Dissertation Change of Grade
    In the semester in which the final manuscript has been received, reviewed, and certified for permanent filing in the University Library, the Office of Graduate Studies submits the change of grade from “Z” to “S” for the last registration of dissertation courses to the office of the registrar when all grades are due at the end of the semester.

     


    1April Burke, “University Policies on Conflict of Interest and Delay of Publications,” Report of the Clearinghouse on University-Industry Relations, Association of American Universities, February, 1985.


    Expand
    titleUse of "Ph.D." in Credentials and Publication

    Students may only use the credential of “Ph.D.” after degree conferral is granted. It is inappropriate to use the credential until it is officially and formally granted. The use of the abbreviation “Ph.D.” in university publications, correspondence, etc., including websites and other electronic media, shall be upper case “P”, lower case “h” followed by a period, an upper case “D” and another period. It shall not be used in the format of all upper case letters without periods, as in “PH.D.”

    Expand
    titleDoctoral Project Plan Guidance

    Doctoral Project Plan Outline

    Doctoral Project Plan Description

    ...