📋 Overview

Welcome to the documentation supporting the Assessment Compliance Report at USF!

...

1. Approved (2022 and beyond), Compliant (2017-2021), Developed and Highly Developed (2016-2017): All elements of the Plan/Report meet the USF Assessment Standards

2. Reviewed with Comments (Minor Revisions) (2022 and beyond), Non-Compliant 1 (2017-2021), and Emerging (2016-2017): Minor revisions would be required to bring the document into compliance. These often include but are not limited to: including the total number of students assessed, ensuring that some form of inter-rater agreement data is collected or planned to be collected for assessment methods with a subjective scale (such as a scoring rubric for a project), and not including specific action items resulting from the use of the assessment results.

3. Reviewed with Comments (Majors Revisions) (2022 and beyond), Non-Complaint 2 (2017-2021), and Initial (2016-2017): Components are missing from the document or are entirely outside the scope of commonly accepted good practice. Examples of major revisions needed are the use of the phrase “we will continue to monitor this outcome” in the “Use of Assessment Results” section of an Assessment Report or the exclusive use of course grades or course passing as the “Methods of Assessment” section of an Assessment Plan.

4. On Hold/NA: There are no students available, or, there is another reason that has provided an approved delay in submission.

...